Marius Gedminas wrote:
People make mistakes. Can we reduce the number/severity of those
mistakes by creating a Python script to automate the release process as
much as possible?
[snip]
I'd be happy to work on such a script during the sprint, if someone
could help me figure out what exactly
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm not too keen on trying to automate this with a Python script. I
suggest we start with a human script.
I agree.
I think Philipp has a start at this. Philipp, could you remind
us where this is?
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 04:19:35PM +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Any other suggestions are highly welcome.
That problem with building eggs on Windows: if you need to pass some
argument to setup.py sdist to get a tar.gz egg, please update
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm not too keen on trying to automate this with a Python script. I
suggest we start with a human script. I think Philipp has a start at
this. Philipp, could you remind
us where this is? I suggest we review it and then post it prominately
somewhere that people (I) can
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
Doing another checkout of the tag
will create a significant overhead to the release process of a package.
I'd like to highlight this. We need to be careful we don't increase
release overhead too much, otherwise it won't happen/people will make
mistakes.
On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
Doing another checkout of the tag will create a significant
overhead to the release process of a package.
I'd like to highlight this. We need to be careful we don't increase
release overhead too much,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:19:45PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
Doing another checkout of the tag will create a significant overhead to
the release process of a package.
I'd like to highlight this. We need to be careful we don't increase release
overhead too
On 9/26/07, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reducing overhead is why I proposed an automated tool.
Exactly. I like this approach myself.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.fdrake at gmail.com
Chaos is the score upon which reality is written. --Henry Miller
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 17:18 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I definitely think we should work out a human procedure *first*.
But some tools to assist the human in doing repetitive, failure-prone
work (releasing versions of many eggs) would definitely be appreciated
by me.
Perhaps these
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-9-26 16:19 +0200:
...
* That you should never ever delete a release, even if it's a
brown bag release.
But, if you know it is severely broken and you do not have
a working replacement, you should remove it as soon as possible
-- to avoid more people to
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-9-26 16:19 +0200:
...
* That you should never ever delete a release, even if it's a
brown bag release.
But, if you know it is severely broken and you do not have
a working replacement, you should remove it as soon as possible
--
Fred Drake wrote:
On 9/26/07, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reducing overhead is why I proposed an automated tool.
Exactly. I like this approach myself.
Sure, I support it too. That said, I'd still like the process *without*
the tool comprehensible by normal human beings. The
On 9/26/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, I'd still like the process *without*
the tool comprehensible by normal human beings.
Agreed; I was trying to usurp the goal of having a reasonable process.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.fdrake at gmail.com
Chaos is the score
13 matches
Mail list logo
