Dear Jim,
I tried to keep it simple, but you're right I missed the work items.
Now I updated the model also with the attributes and methods by using
pyreverse. I hope it did not miss any.
PS: please check my next mail document management app
Monday, October 24, 2005, 10:40:33 PM, you wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 07:49, Adam Groszer wrote:
I tried to keep it simple, but you're right I missed the work items.
Now I updated the model also with the attributes and methods by using
pyreverse. I hope it did not miss any.
The graph does not establish the link between an application
On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:26, Adam Groszer wrote:
I'm doing these reverse engineerings because I have to create a document
management app with the following basic requirements:
- Document storage
- Version control
- Workflow control
- Basic search and filter
- Basic export function
Hello Stephan,
The model (In fact, maybe digging through the source?) made the
picture clearer for me.
My small problem is that I have to do this model anyway:
- the app is for my college degree
- there is a company who sponsors the work
Both resist on the UML model :-(
I don't like it also, but
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 07:49, Adam Groszer wrote:
I tried to keep it simple, but you're right I missed the work items.
Now I updated the model also with the attributes and methods by using
pyreverse. I hope it did not miss any.
The graph does not establish the
Hi everyone,
with October winding down, the freeze on the trunk is coming quickly. So, if
you have any outstanding work, now is the time to get it done. During the
last week I have monitored the proposals and branches a bit and I think most
people are done with their work.
After Michael told
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
with October winding down, the freeze on the trunk is coming quickly. So, if
you have any outstanding work, now is the time to get it done. During the
last week I have monitored the proposals and branches a bit and I think
On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:33, Julien Anguenot wrote:
Is it ok for everybody ?
Yep, since another core developer was involved in the proposal, this is fine.
I assume Jim had something to say about this already too.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
with October winding down, the freeze on the trunk is coming quickly.
So, if you have any outstanding work, now is the time to get it done.
During the last week I have monitored the proposals and branches a
bit and I think most
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
fred-win.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 1123
Blamelist: fdrake,tim_one
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
Logs are attached.
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
svn: Unknown hostname
10 matches
Mail list logo
