Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-13 11:05 +0200:
>Over the last couple of days we've been discussing Zope's new release
>cycle and the release management. I would like to sum up what seems to
>be the gist of those discussions:
>
>
>9 month release period?
>---
I am a
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 11:02, Florent Xicluna wrote:
Currently, I work with 3.3 branch for my company. I checked out the trunk
too, in order to collaborate to Zope development.
So I have both '/trunk' and '/branches/3.3/' on my computer. When I prepare
a fix I do i
Florent Xicluna wrote:
However i have a worry on the "Fix oldest branch, merge to newer branches".
I guess this is due to my young experience with SVN development.
Currently, I work with 3.3 branch for my company. I checked out the trunk too,
in order to collaborate to Zope development.
So I hav
On 9/12/06, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, I use the following approach:
- Early in the process, I mark every real reproducable bug as blocking.
In this last go around, this included a number of bugs that had been
around for months or years.
- Later in the process I downgrade
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 11:02, Florent Xicluna wrote:
Currently, I work with 3.3 branch for my company. I checked out
the trunk
too, in order to collaborate to Zope development.
So I have both '/trunk' and '/branches/3.3/' on my com
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 11:02, Florent Xicluna wrote:
> Currently, I work with 3.3 branch for my company. I checked out the trunk
> too, in order to collaborate to Zope development.
> So I have both '/trunk' and '/branches/3.3/' on my computer. When I prepare
> a fix I do it on the 3.3 branc
Philipp von Weitershausen weitershausen.de> writes:
> Over the last couple of days we've been discussing Zope's new release
> cycle and the release management. I would like to sum up what seems to
> be the gist of those discussions:
I agree with the overall policy to improve the release machin
Stephan Richter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just noticed that zope.conf.in has now the following entry:
server localhost:8100
storage 1
cache-size 20MB
This means that ZEO has to start up to run Zope after a default check
out/download. When I had no network connection in a hotel
Hi everyone,
I just noticed that zope.conf.in has now the following entry:
server localhost:8100
storage 1
cache-size 20MB
This means that ZEO has to start up to run Zope after a default check
out/download. When I had no network connection in a hotel last week, I could
not
Previously Anton Stonor wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>
> > Shall we release once every 9 months from now on?
>
> 9 months pregnancy -- that's almost poetic.
And painful to deliver?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Shall we release once every 9 months from now on?
9 months pregnancy -- that's almost poetic.
/Anton
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40ma
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I don't have time for a discussion right now as I'm off to Germany soon.
The one thought that strikes me is that these release management notes,
when finalized, should be in some clear, findable, well-known and
maintained location. Otherwise we'll forget again. I know, th
Hey,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
Thoughts?
I don't have time for a discussion right now as I'm off to Germany soon.
The one thought that strikes me is that these release management notes,
when finalized, should be in some clear, findable, well-known and
maintained location. Othe
Over the last couple of days we've been discussing Zope's new release
cycle and the release management. I would like to sum up what seems to
be the gist of those discussions:
9 month release period?
---
Several consumers of Zope releases have talked about their experience
Hello Stephan,
Simple, effective, great. Thanks.
Monday, September 11, 2006, 7:45:42 PM, you wrote:
> On Monday 11 September 2006 13:23, Adam Groszer wrote:
>> The solution might be simple, but at this late time I don't see it.
>> Any help is welcome.
> No, the solution was not even possible (e
15 matches
Mail list logo