Hello:
As Python 2.4.4 is now recommended for Zope 3.3.1, the configure script
should be updated, it still says 2.4.3
# Place the optimal target version number (as returned by sys.version)
# below
TARGET="2.4.3"
thx
--Craeg
___
Zope3-dev ma
I've just posted a followup; the wiki should be back to normal now.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I'm sorry about the outage.. see
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.websites for updates.
-Simon
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I have developed a small tool that allows me to connect to an
application running in a functional test. I think it would be a nice
addition to zope.testing. The usage is very simple. I just add
startServer to my functional test globs and in a functional test do:
startServer(http, manager.url, "
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Craeg Strong wrote:
http://wiki.zope.org/yields
Bad Gateway
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
Any ideas?
That machine is having some database problems. It is being worked on.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton ma
http://wiki.zope.org/yields
Bad Gateway
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
Any ideas?
--Craeg
To reproduce:
1) goto http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope3/3.3.1
2) click on "Information" link
___
Zope3-dev mai
On Feb 15, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
...
Agreed. Anyway, atleast we will be required a README.txt and
CHANGES.txt
I would argue that those belong in the *package*, not in the
"building"
directory (the one containing 'setup.py'), because they are
relelvant to
users of the buil
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On behalf of the Zope Foundation I'm happy to announce the release of
Zope 3.3.1, a bugfix release for the current stable 3.3.x line. Zope
3.3.1 contains a number of bugfixes, though most importantly it fixes
compatibility with Python 2.4.4.
You can find more
On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Baiju M wrote:
> Hi, I am not getting any changes (through checkins mailing list)
> made to zope eggs recently by 'alex' (committer id)
>
> alex, I read your commit mesage: "Remove setup.cfg.in, INSTA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baiju M wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Baiju M wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I am not getting any changes (through checkins mailing list)
>>> made to zope eggs recently by 'alex' (committer id)
>>>
>>> alex, I read your commit mesage:
Hi!
When I was playing with widgets, I saw that current version of
pageform.pt javascript did not work properly in IE ver 6...something ;),
not actually matters (but worked fine in FF and Opera).
When I changed a few lines, now it works for my IE (6.sth), FF (2.0.0.1)
and Opera(9.01) version
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Baiju M wrote:
> Hi, I am not getting any changes (through checkins mailing list)
> made to zope eggs recently by 'alex' (committer id)
>
> alex, I read your commit mesage: "Remove setup.cfg.in, INSTALL.txt,
> CHANGES.txt, test.py, MANIFEST.in and
On Feb 15, 2007, at 4:57 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Interesting. plone.portlets actually uses the Component
Architecture and a persistent registry as the underlying "plugin
system", it just provides a fancy UI on top of this to manipulate
On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:02 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Hi,
I am not getting any changes (through checkins mailing list)
made to zope eggs recently by 'alex' (committer id)
alex, I read your commit mesage: "Remove setup.cfg.in, INSTALL.txt,
CHANGES.txt, test.py, MANIFEST.in and
README.txt becaus
Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Interesting. plone.portlets actually uses the Component Architecture and
a persistent registry as the underlying "plugin system", it just
provides a fancy UI on top of this to manipulate the registry.
Is this an adapter registry, a utility
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Interesting. plone.portlets actually uses the Component Architecture and
a persistent registry as the underlying "plugin system", it just
provides a fancy UI on top of this to manipulate the registry.
Is this an adapter registry, a utility registry or both?
Wha
Hi,
I am not getting any changes (through checkins mailing list) made
to zope eggs recently by 'alex' (committer id)
alex, I read your commit mesage: "Remove setup.cfg.in, INSTALL.txt,
CHANGES.txt, test.py, MANIFEST.in and
README.txt because they are no longer needed."
Why these files ar
17 matches
Mail list logo
