Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
The ExtensionClass changes are not done,
and I think there are other C-level changes which have not
It was never said whether Zope 2 would be part of the GSoC project or
not. That said, we can't drop Python 2.4 support until
... we've made sure Zope 2 runs on
Tres Seaver wrote:
In fact Python 2.5 porting was not as much difficult as predicted in an
old thread [1].
It isn't done yet, so I'm not sure what you are talking about.
Especially the difficult part, the untrusted code stuff in Zope 2,
hasn't been tackled at all.
Nikhil has completed port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> David Pratt wrote:
>> Ultimately, the
>> folks that will even want to maintain a 2.x code base will quickly erode
>> since the forefront of development is never the past. Perhaps it will
>> all move more quickly f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baiju M wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> David Pratt wrote:
>>> Hi. I am concerned about the announcement of python 3000 today that
>>> will break backwards compatibility. Zope and twisted are my
>>> favorite frameworks. The code base for
Yes these are all fairly painful scenarios. What's worse is the scenario
for organizations evaluating zope end user software using python 2. It's
will not be a great selling feature to start with the premise that
anything you see today will require major refactoring to give provide a
measure of
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> David Pratt wrote:
>> Ultimately, the
>> folks that will even want to maintain a 2.x code base will quickly
>> erode since the forefront of development is never the past. Perhaps
>> it will all move more quickly for this reason when python 3K is out
>> for real.
Baiju M wrote:
BTW, do we need to upload eggs to http://download.zope.org/distribution/
any more ?
If we feel that depending on PyPI to install zope packages is OK, then
we can decommission /distribution/. For the commercial projects I'm
involved in we make sure we have private copies of eve
On 2 Sep 2007, at 07:23 , Baiju M wrote:
The tarball Baiju uploaded this afternoon is broken. I wanted to
upload a fixed one, but it turns out I don't have permissions on
PyPI. I already tried pinging Theuni and Baiju about this, but no
response so far. I'm CCing them and Jim now, hoping one
--On 1. September 2007 21:40:20 +0200 Martijn Faassen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
David Pratt wrote:
Ultimately, the
folks that will even want to maintain a 2.x code base will quickly erode
since the forefront of development is never the past. Perhaps it will
all move more quickly fo
