Martin Aspeli wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:57, Jim Fulton wrote:
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
-1. I do not follow zope-dev at all and the traffic is pretty high there.
But pretty l
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:57, Jim Fulton wrote:
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
-1. I do not follow zope-dev at all and the traffic is pretty high there.
If you "do not follow it at all",
Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:32 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Any objections?
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
+1
What about retiring #zope3-dev IRC channel and only using #zope ?
Roger Ineichen wrote:
> What do you recommend to do? I'm open to improve it but how can we reflect
> the different adaption concepts like we have with the different __init__
> used by IPagelet and IContentProvider.
It should be easy to do by using a factory function which is registered as
the mul
--On 4. Oktober 2007 15:15:40 -0400 Stephan Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:57, Jim Fulton wrote:
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
-1. I do not follow zope-dev at all and the traf
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:57, Jim Fulton wrote:
> This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
> zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
-1. I do not follow zope-dev at all and the traffic is pretty high there.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemis
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:44:21PM +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release process.
>> Philipp, would you mind separating the release process into a separate
>> file? Or do you mind if I do it?
>
> Done:
>
On 10/4/07, Michael R. Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
> > > zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
> >
> > +1
+1
> > What about retiring #zope3-dev IRC channel and only using #zope ?
>
> No. #zope is roughly the equ
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:32 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> > This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
> > zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
>
> +1
>
> What about retiring #zope3-dev IRC channel and only using #zope ?
No.
On Oct 4, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Any objections?
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
+1
What about retiring #zope3-dev IRC channel and only using #zope ?
I though of that. Historicall
Jim Fulton wrote:
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
+100
--
http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.or
Jim Fulton wrote:
Any objections?
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
+1
What about retiring #zope3-dev IRC channel and only using #zope ?
Regards,
Baiju M
___
Zope3-dev ma
There's work going on to create a second version of WSGI. Last time,
we didn't pay much attention until WSGI was a done deal. This time,
I think it would be better if we were involved earlier.
Unfortunately, I don't have time to pay attention. Does anyone else?
Jim
P.S. I'd lobe to a
Any objections?
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/optio
On Oct 4, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 4, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2007, at 00:59 , Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to clo
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 4, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2007, at 00:59 , Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved
release proc
On Oct 4, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 4 Oct 2007, at 00:59 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved
release process. Philipp, would you mind separat
Not sure what Zope 3 is using these days (haven't checked), but Zope 2
had a 'Signals' package that handled signaling events on both Windows
and *nix in a somewhat transparent way. Has anyone thought of
packaging that as an egg?
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystem
On 4 Oct 2007, at 00:59 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process. Philipp, would you mind separating the release process
into a separate file? Or do you mind
Hi Theune,
I updated instructions here:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/StabilizeEggPackages .
Can you please review it ?
Regards,
Baiju M
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-de
20 matches
Mail list logo