On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
tests :-) ) so it seems safe from my perspective.
I was trying to apply the
Hi,
Gary Poster wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
tests :-) ) so it seems safe from my perspective.
I
On Dec 20, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Gary Poster wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
Christian Theune wrote:
I'd both apply r70331 and r71548 to 3.3 and 3.2 then.
JFTR: I've backported the small restructuring and the bugfix in r71612
(3.2) and r71611 (3.3)
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Dec 14, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
...
Zagy and I fixed this issue, by making the methods _getCurrentValue
and _getFormValue use a common method to retrieve the input value
and handle the case of converting to the form value cleanly.
However, we are not sure, whether
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
tests :-) ) so it seems safe from my perspective.
I was trying to apply the patch to the 3.3 branch and noticed that the
patch isn't
