Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: Zope3/branches/jim-adapter/src/zope/ Redeprecated a number of things that didn't generate warnings

2006-03-15 Thread Jim Fulton
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17:26, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: The import doesn't, but the use of each method did because they looked like this: def getView(object, name, request, providing=Interface, context=None): if __warn__:

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: Zope3/branches/jim-adapter/src/zope/ Redeprecated a number of things that didn't generate warnings

2006-03-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stephan Richter wrote: > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17:26, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > The import doesn't, but the use of each method did because they looked > > like this: > > > > def getView(object, name, request, providing=Interface, context=None): > > if __warn__: > > warning

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: Zope3/branches/jim-adapter/src/zope/ Redeprecated a number of things that didn't generate warnings

2006-03-14 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17:26, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > The import doesn't, but the use of each method did because they looked > like this: > > def getView(object, name, request, providing=Interface, context=None): >     if __warn__: >         warnings.warn( >             "The concrete c

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: Zope3/branches/jim-adapter/src/zope/ Redeprecated a number of things that didn't generate warnings

2006-03-14 Thread Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:26, Jim Fulton wrote: This is going to take quite a bit of work to sort out. If someone else wants to try and sort this out, I'm willing to suspend work on my adapter branch until it's done. I guess it would be better to work on your branch

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: Zope3/branches/jim-adapter/src/zope/ Redeprecated a number of things that didn't generate warnings

2006-03-14 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:26, Jim Fulton wrote: > This is going to take quite a bit of work to sort out. > > If someone else wants to try and sort this out, I'm willing to > suspend work on my adapter branch until it's done. I guess it would be better to work on your branch, since you get the wa