On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:48:44PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
> On 7/11/07, Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any suggestions as to how to get the actual text when building the
>> tarball?
> ...
>> None of them is very appetizing.
>
> No, they're not. Anyone wonder why developers treat
On 7/11/07, Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As long as it's in the tarball, I'm happy (though I suppose the eggs
need it too).
Yep, thanks to the license terms themselves. --sigh--
Any suggestions as to how to get the actual text when building the
tarball?
...
None of them is v
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:45:41AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
> Fred Drake wrote:
>> It seems that if the ZPL is required to be in distributions, it needs
>> to be added to the result of "setup.py sdist" and the various bdist_*
>> commands (including bdist_egg).
>
> +lots
As long as it's in the tarb
Fred Drake wrote:
It seems that if the ZPL is required to be in distributions, it needs
to be added to the result of "setup.py sdist" and the various bdist_*
commands (including bdist_egg).
+lots
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Brian Sutherland wrote:
The important part is:
"A copy of the ZPL should accompany this distribution."
Hmm. I've never thought of the svn checkouts as distributions.
On 7/11/07, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, I'd hate for the license file to pollute the root directory of
eve
[moving this to zope3-dev]
Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:31:13AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
Log message for revision 77690:
Add the ZPL text.
Why?
##
#
# Copyright (c) 20