Gary Poster wrote:
While reasearching Ajax technology, I stumbled across this site:
http://www.backbase.com/
I doubt we'll agree as a community on a non-open-source platform.
I wouldn't dream of suggesting that. It was the approach I found
interresting.
What I meant was that we could deve
On Sep 7, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Max M wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
The use case for this tool is to allow rich view components, such
as form widgets (but there are many other examples), that rely on
JS and CSS to work in a more componentized, drop-in way.
While reasearching Ajax technolog
Gary Poster wrote:
The use case for this tool is to allow rich view components, such as
form widgets (but there are many other examples), that rely on JS and
CSS to work in a more componentized, drop-in way.
While reasearching Ajax technology, I stumbled across this site:
http://www.backb
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> I've added a proposal for Zope 3.2. Read at http://www.zope.org/
>> Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/ResourceLibrary.
>>
>> WARNING: zope.org exhibiting some
This is very interesting to me as well.
I am starting a project with the goal of producing a zope3-based web
application that makes heavy use of AJAX.
--Craeg
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> I've added a proposal for Zope 3.2. Read at http://www.zope.or
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> I've added a proposal for Zope 3.2. Read at http://www.zope.org/
>> Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/ResourceLibrary.
>>
>> WARNING: zope.org exhibiting some serious caching strangeness, so
>> please comment on the
Gary Poster wrote:
> We think this will allow for a much nicer rich sub-view (i.e., rich
> widget, among others) story. We're eager to get some feedback,
> including ideas for improvements.
+1; I'd rely on this. But the next 5 weeks I have no bandwidth to give
the proposal much attention due to e
