Am Samstag, 16. April 2005 01:55 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> > That works now, but I get a error with instruction:
> >
> > htmlcode += view.index["childInfo"] <--
> >
> > traceback:
> >
> > File
> > "/home/florian/Desktop/zope/lib/python/CS/centershock/browser/
> > skin/views.py",
> > line 41, in g
Hi Florian
From: Florian Lindner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 10:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [Zope3-Users] page uses
> foreignview:contextchanged
>
[snip]
> >
> > I'm not sure if you have a ViewPageTemplate
Am Samstag, 16. April 2005 11:59 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> Hi Florian
>
> From: Florian Lindner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 10:28 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org
> > Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [Zope3-Users] page uses
> > foreignview:conte
Hi all,
I'm a newbie and just installed the zope3 package on windows. I'm writing
because i believe there is a bug in the mysqlda adaptor add-in package.
My configuration is as follows:
* OS = Windows XP Professional SP2
* Python Version = Python-2.3.5.exe
* Zope Version = ZopeX3-3.0.0.win32-py2.
Hi Florian
Behalf Of Florian Lindner
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 12:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [Zope3-Users] page uses
> foreignview:contextchanged
>
> Am Samstag, 16. April 2005 11:59 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> > Hi Florian
[snip]
>
Recent changes to the transaction management API seem to have come out
of the blue and without warning. Perhaps I missed an announcement.
Are we to expect breakages of this sort on occasion?
-- Garrett
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsu
Am Samstag, 16. April 2005 13:03 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> Hi Florian
>
> Behalf Of Florian Lindner
>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 12:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org
> > Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [Zope3-Users] page uses
> > foreignview:contextchanged
> >
> > Am S
Am Samstag, 16. April 2005 13:03 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> Hi Florian
>
> Behalf Of Florian Lindner
>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 12:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org
> > Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [Zope3-Users] page uses
> > foreignview:contextchanged
> >
> > Am S
[Garrett Smith]
> Recent changes to the transaction management API seem to have come
> out of the blue and without warning. Perhaps I missed an announcement.
>
> Are we to expect breakages of this sort on occasion?
Not often. The formal interfaces for the transaction API contained
errors (of omis
Garrett Smith wrote:
Recent changes to the transaction management API seem to have come out
of the blue and without warning. Perhaps I missed an announcement.
Are we to expect breakages of this sort on occasion?
Was there breakage? If there was, it was unintended.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Garrett Smith wrote:
>> Recent changes to the transaction management API seem to have come
>> out of the blue and without warning. Perhaps I missed an
>> announcement.
>>
>> Are we to expect breakages of this sort on occasion?
>
> Was there breakage? If there was, it was unin
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Garrett Smith]
>> Recent changes to the transaction management API seem to have come
>> out of the blue and without warning. Perhaps I missed an
>> announcement.
>>
>> Are we to expect breakages of this sort on occasion?
>
> Not often. The formal interfaces for the transact
[Garrett Smith]
>>> Recent changes to the transaction management API seem to have come
>>> out of the blue and without warning. Perhaps I missed an
>>> announcement.
>>>
>>> Are we to expect breakages of this sort on occasion?
[Jim Fulton]
>> Was there breakage? If there was, it was unintended.
[
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Jim Fulton]
>>> Was there breakage? If there was, it was unintended.
>
> [Garrett]
>> IDataManager was completely restructured.
This was not accurate -- the restructuring happened a while ago and I
didn't catch it. I assumed this change was made along with the one I
list belo
Garrett Smith wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
[Jim Fulton]
Was there breakage? If there was, it was unintended.
[Garrett]
IDataManager was completely restructured.
This was not accurate -- the restructuring happened a while ago and I
didn't catch it. I assumed this change was made along with the one I
li
[Garrett]
>>> IDataManager was completely restructured.
[Garrett]
> This was not accurate -- the restructuring happened a while ago and I
> didn't catch it. I assumed this change was made along with the one I
> list below.
OK, that helps a bit. Thanks!
[Tim]
>> If you don't have specific breaka
Tim Peters wrote:
> Maybe we need to stuff this crap back in again, despite that it's
> usless (the only thing actually implemented was an elaborate way of
> raising NotImplementedError) and misleading (because the ZODB4 scheme
> will never be implemented)? I don't know, but it sure isn't
> attrac
Jim Fulton wrote:
> You were using? Or implementing? Do you realize that these wern't
> actually being used and wern't implemented correctly?
Sorry, implementing, not using.
> (BTW, One of the reasons for doing this cleanup is to set the stage
> for a decent savepoint implementation.)
>
>>> A
18 matches
Mail list logo
