Dmitry Vasiliev a écrit :
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Did someone have a look on this error ? Is it a trivial thing, or a
local configuration problem, or is it reproduceable?
(I write in utf-8, and I put # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- in my interfaces.py)
You must use unicode docstrings. The
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
Log message for revision 72044: Add zope.app.annotation as a
top-level package.
Changed: A zope.app.annotation/ A zope.app.annotation/branches/
A zope.app.annotation/tags/ A zope.app.annotation/trunk/
-=-
Is it really necessary to
Hi All,
I was wondering if someone could give me a definitive explanation of
what the following means:
adapter
for=* ISomething *
...
...means?
Is the following equivalent:
provideAdapter(...,adapts=(None,ISomething,None),...)
?
If it is, then which of the following should I use
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if someone could give me a definitive explanation of
what the following means:
adapter
for=* ISomething *
...
...means?
Is the following equivalent:
provideAdapter(...,adapts=(None,ISomething,None),...)
No, but this
--On 16. Januar 2007 14:12:46 +0100 Martijn Faassen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am replying to the three proposals. First I have to kick the proposal of
Tres (UTF-8 storage). We want unicode as internal representation for any
kind of ZPT (both text/html and text/xml). Supporting unicode
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:37:52AM -0800, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
I was wondering if someone could give me a definitive explanation of
what the following means:
adapter
for=* ISomething *
...
...means?
Is the following equivalent:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
That's what I do too...
See my post elsewhere in the thread for an example of why this is Not Good.
Luckily Twiddler is still less than version 1.0 ;-)
When someone reports it as a bug, I'll fix it.
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python
Stephan Richter wrote:
My major concern is speed here. Any debug handling will make the registry
slower; I am using adapters very heavily in my code and any slow-down of one
lookup would be multiplied many times.
+ sys.maxint.
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python
Baiju M wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
Log message for revision 72044: Add zope.app.annotation as a
top-level package.
Changed: A zope.app.annotation/ A zope.app.annotation/branches/
A zope.app.annotation/tags/ A zope.app.annotation/trunk/
-=-
Is it really
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2007-1-16 23:19 +0100:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2007-1-15 15:44 +0100:
I would say refusing to guess and bailing out with an error message is
better in this case.
I disagree with you.
Logically, parsing an encoded XML document consists
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-1-17 17:48 +0100:
...
So Martijn's and my proposal remain. They are not very different. In the
end the behavior is almost identical. But I will adopt your suggestion to
remove
the preamble when storing the data internally (basically to avoid a
possible encoding
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if someone could give me a definitive explanation of
what the following means:
adapter
for=* ISomething *
...
...means?
Is the following equivalent:
provideAdapter(...,adapts=(None,ISomething,None),...)
?
Yes.
If it is, then which
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if someone could give me a definitive explanation of
what the following means:
adapter
for=* ISomething *
...
...means?
Is the following equivalent:
provideAdapter(...,adapts=(None,ISomething,None),...)
No,
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 14:25, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
'We've tried to look up an adapter for (ISomething, ITheOther) but
none was found'
'Found an adapter for IFoo, which is a base class for the IBar
interface requested. No adapter has been found for the
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I suggest we come up with a prioritized list instead of alphabetical.
+1
Baiju M wrote:
We can eggify all packages except those in Spring cleanup proposal [1]
Sure, we *can*, but I think it's a lot of work and we don't necessarily
have to do all of them.
--On 17. Januar 2007 22:49:11 +0100 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-1-17 17:48 +0100:
...
So Martijn's and my proposal remain. They are not very different. In the
end the behavior is almost identical. But I will adopt your suggestion
to remove
the
16 matches
Mail list logo
