Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-14 Thread Jim Fulton
Ruslan Spivak wrote: Hello. For those who is interested, i created blog entry containing 'timeit' benchmarks results for Python and C versions of AdapterLookup: http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/ruslan_spivak/2005_08_05_adapterlookup_c There is also test script attached there. By my

Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-14 Thread Jim Fulton
Benji York wrote: Ruslan Spivak wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch.

Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Benji York
Ruslan Spivak wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch. That's about a 0.25

Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 05 August 2005 09:46, Benji York wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the

Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Ruslan Spivak
В Птн, 05/08/2005 в 09:46 -0400, Benji York пишет: Ruslan Spivak wrote: [...] Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch. That's about a 0.25 percent improvement. Unfortunately that