Benji York wrote:
Ruslan Spivak wrote:
By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed
up for different methods.
Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests
yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the
branch. T
Ruslan Spivak wrote:
Hello.
For those who is interested, i created blog entry containing 'timeit'
benchmarks results for Python and C versions of AdapterLookup:
http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/ruslan_spivak/2005_08_05_adapterlookup_c
There is also test script attached there.
By my estima
В Птн, 05/08/2005 в 09:46 -0400, Benji York пишет:
> Ruslan Spivak wrote:
[...]
> Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests
> yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the
> branch. That's about a 0.25 percent improvement.
>
> Unfortunately
On Friday 05 August 2005 09:46, Benji York wrote:
> > By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed
> > up for different methods.
>
> Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests
> yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 fo
Ruslan Spivak wrote:
By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed
up for different methods.
Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests
yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the
branch. That's about a 0.25 pe