Hi,
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Christian,
It seems that the activity has the attribute, but it's not declared
in the interface. z.wfmc interface was/is quite out of sync with the
implementation I think. I already fixed some, but looks like there are
still some lurking.
Any chance you want
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
That's definitely a good question. This might lead us to the
discussion
what Zope 3 is.
Yes, which I don't particularly want to do now. :)
Ack. I'm just interested in finding out priorities for bugs (for me).
Hello Christian,
It seems that the activity has the attribute, but it's not declared
in the interface. z.wfmc interface was/is quite out of sync with the
implementation I think. I already fixed some, but looks like there are
still some lurking.
Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:09:21 AM, you
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
what is our desire to keep WFMC workflow support in the core?
What does core mean?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python
Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
what is our desire to keep WFMC workflow support in the core?
What does core mean?
That's definitely a good question. This might lead us to the discussion
what Zope 3 is. Do we have/want a (sharp/blurry) border?
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
what is our desire to keep WFMC workflow support in the core?
What does core mean?
That's definitely a good question. This might lead us to the
discussion
