Hello,
how does that script works? Executing gives an error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Zope3 $ python utilities/static-apidoc /home/florian/z3-doc/
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "utilities/static-apidoc", line 37, in ?
main()
File "/home/florian/Zope3/src/zope/app/apidoc/static.py", li
On 8/14/06, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 14 August 2006 01:00, Jeff Shell wrote:
> If things slow down... uhm, ever... for us, I'd like to see if I can
> get us to open up some of the more generic toolkits we've built up in
> recent months, as they've been very empowering.
On 8/14/06, Carlo Cardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that my company's recent experiences with Zope and SQLAlchemy
> show that the fundamentals of Zope can be terrific toolkit for rich
> object oriented RDBMS / Business Object backed applications that have
> nothing to do with content
On 8/14/06, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, so you fixed the problem with the provider TALES expression,
which has to do update()/render() at the same time. My question
is: How do you know which content providers are used by a view? Do you
manually list them?
A Page class (or
Jeff Shell wrote:
2. There's an 'add to cart' form that is in this page's main template
(or other)
code, and the user has added something to the cart. The 'update' action of
the form adds the item on a post-back. But because it comes *after* the
'cartContents' content provider, the 'cart
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday 14 August 2006 05:27, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets messages to *all* checkins, no matter which
>> package. THe problem is that you guys aren't subscribed to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] so your postings don't show up.
>
> Yes, I am. I switch
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi David
[...]
Hi Roger. This is really interesting. It would be good to see
a very small demo of these nice packages you have been
contributing - something
that would put together the minimal layer, menu package,
and a few basic viewlets just to give folks a basic ide
Hello Stephan,
Monday, August 14, 2006, 12:08:27 PM, you wrote:
SR> We were on schedule and delivered an application above expectations.
SR> BTW, I hope I will get a case study out in the next few weeks.
Great, I'd love to read that.
--
Best regards,
Groszer Adam
--
Quote of the day:
Ah, bu
On Monday 14 August 2006 05:08, Carlo Cardelli wrote:
> > I think that my company's recent experiences with Zope and SQLAlchemy
>
> > show that the fundamentals of Zope can be terrific toolkit for rich
> > object oriented RDBMS / Business Object backed applications that have
> > nothing to do with
On Monday 14 August 2006 05:56, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday 14 August 2006 05:27, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets messages to *all* checkins, no matter which
> > package. THe problem is that you guys aren't subscribed to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] so your postings don'
On Monday 14 August 2006 05:27, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets messages to *all* checkins, no matter which
> package. THe problem is that you guys aren't subscribed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] so your postings don't show up.
Yes, I am. I switched on the day the list was creat
Roger Ineichen wrote:
> Hi Mailman
>
> [...]
>>> While we are at it, 'lovely' packages do not show up in
>>> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins until now.
>> Mmh, right. Unfortunately I do not have the permissions to fix this.
>
> If you add lovely to the checkin massages, please add also
Jeff,
Before everything else, thank you very much for sharing your thoughts
and experience: as a newcomer, I found them very valuable.
Hm. It seems like a NameChooser should *somehow* be giving you a
usable name. That pair::
container[name] = content
return container[name]
seems redun
Hi Mailman
[...]
> >
> > While we are at it, 'lovely' packages do not show up in
> > http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins until now.
>
> Mmh, right. Unfortunately I do not have the permissions to fix this.
If you add lovely to the checkin massages, please add also
the *z3c* top level namesp
On Monday 14 August 2006 04:30, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
> > Lovely Systems, Roger and I have all been in agreement to publish generic
> > components as we go; if you are subscribed to all check-in messages, you
> > probably saw already a bunch of packages landing in th
On Monday 14 August 2006 01:00, Jeff Shell wrote:
> I (mildly) agree. In my `WebPageSupport` mix-in, I've added a method
> `renderProvider`. Primarily it was to get around calling the provider
> a second time and having its `update` method called again, although
> I've now added some a `hasUpdated`
On Sunday 13 August 2006 08:35, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Yeah, I'm not convinced. At least not by the current Boston skin. I find
> its code over-structured (subpackages just for the sake of subpackages,
> it seems). Also, it isn't as flexible as one would think it is. It
> claims it uses
Stephan Richter wrote:
Lovely Systems, Roger and I have all been in agreement to publish generic
components as we go; if you are subscribed to all check-in messages, you
probably saw already a bunch of packages landing in the z3c and lovely
namespace. We have tasks setup for this week to open/p
On Monday 14 August 2006 01:00, Jeff Shell wrote:
> If things slow down... uhm, ever... for us, I'd like to see if I can
> get us to open up some of the more generic toolkits we've built up in
> recent months, as they've been very empowering.
You should really do this as you code. Not only do you
On Monday 14 August 2006 01:00, Jeff Shell wrote:
> Skinning aside, it's nice to be able to componentize the page. We've
> already made some common Viewlets that can be used in a project with
> very little fuss, such as Menu renderers. CSS applies most of the
> visual styles. The standard template,
Hi Martijn
Thanks for that. Sounds really cool.
Regards
Roger Ineichen
_
END OF MESSAGE
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martijn Pieters
> Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 5:32 PM
> To: zope-announce@zope.or
Hi David
[...]
> Hi Roger. This is really interesting. It would be good to see
> a very small demo of these nice packages you have been
> contributing - something
> that would put together the minimal layer, menu package,
> and a few basic viewlets just to give folks a basic idea of
> what c
22 matches
Mail list logo
