Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Next steps...

Chris Withers wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >> I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally >> prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for >> actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead >> putting everything

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Next steps...

Chris Withers wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >> I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally >> prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for >> actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead >> putting everything

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Next steps...

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead putting everything in site.zcml useful, because it's

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Next steps...

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Tim Penhey wrote: Does this mean that a second edition is in the works? Yup. Nice to hear! The first edition helped me a lot. Is there already a time frame when it will be available? And is there a wish list for topics I want to see? ;-) regards, Achim ___

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Next steps...

Tim Penhey wrote: > On 7/24/06, *Philipp von Weitershausen* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Note that in newer Zopes we have a debug shell which saves you a lot of > typing. Simply execute "bin/zopectl debug" from your instance (you don't > even have to put

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Next steps...

On 7/24/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Note that in newer Zopes we have a debug shell which saves you a lot oftyping. Simply execute "bin/zopectl debug" from your instance (you don'teven have to put $INSTANCE/lib/python on your PYTHONPATH), the effect is the same as the De