Am 30.07.2007 um 19:37 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
I'm not sure what "working in the zc.buildout" is supposed to mean.
I don't consider zc.buildout evil. Not totally at least :).
I benefit from zc.buildout in two ways for my zope projects since i
figured it out:
- every-time-and-
On 30 Jul 2007, at 19:14 , Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2007 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
On 29 Jul 2007, at 21:06 , Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use a Zope3 svn checkout for developem
Am Montag, 30. Juli 2007 schrieb Stephan Richter:
> On Monday 30 July 2007 09:59, Jeff Shell wrote:
> > Last time I checked, which I admit has been a while, buildout didn't
> > provide any examples of how to transition into buildout style
> > development.
>
> I agree we are totally lacking At the
Am Sonntag, 29. Juli 2007 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
> On 29 Jul 2007, at 21:06 , Florian Lindner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
> >> Florian Lindner wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> I use a Zope3 svn checkout for developement. What is the best way
> >>> t
On 30 Jul 2007, at 17:19 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 30 July 2007 09:59, Jeff Shell wrote:
Last time I checked, which I admit has been a while, buildout didn't
provide any examples of how to transition into buildout style
development.
I agree we are totally lacking At the one end we pu
Jeff Shell wrote:
Getting started as eggs is one thing. Moving code that is not in an
egg format is another, particularly in a system like CVS which is
brain dead about directories. But I think I just need to revisit the
CVS manual for this.
Normally little or nothing more than giving your code
On 7/30/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 30 July 2007 09:59, Jeff Shell wrote:
> > Last time I checked, which I admit has been a while, buildout didn't
> > provide any examples of how to transition into buildout style
> > development.
>
> I agree we are totally lacking At
On Monday 30 July 2007 09:59, Jeff Shell wrote:
> Last time I checked, which I admit has been a while, buildout didn't
> provide any examples of how to transition into buildout style
> development.
I agree we are totally lacking At the one end we push hard for people to use
eggs -- even make the
On 7/25/07, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Lindner wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I use a Zope3 svn checkout for developement. What is the best way to
> > make this working with the zc packages? I don't want to easy_install
> > the entire Zope checkout but I also want my code
On 29 Jul 2007, at 23:27 , Tom Dossis wrote:
P.S.: I can't recommend easy_install because that will install
eggs into the global site-packages location (which is rarely a
good idea when you're deploying Zope). Unless of course you use
workingenv or virtual python.
You can configure the eas
P.S.: I can't recommend easy_install because that will install eggs
into the global site-packages location (which is rarely a good idea
when you're deploying Zope). Unless of course you use workingenv or
virtual python.
You can configure the easy_install target location(s) easily enough:
On 29 Jul 2007, at 21:06 , Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use a Zope3 svn checkout for developement. What is the best way
to make
this working with the zc packages? I don't want to easy_install the
entire Z
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
> Florian Lindner wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I use a Zope3 svn checkout for developement. What is the best way to make
> > this working with the zc packages? I don't want to easy_install the
> > entire Zope checkout but I also want my code to
13 matches
Mail list logo
