On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Daryl Tester wrote:
> >No - just using the GPL'd adapter do not require you to distribute Zope
> > under GPL. The adapter is just a "plugin"; there was an explanation from
> > RMS that GPL'd plugins does not require to GPL the main program and vice
> > versa; there probably
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>> True. The problem is that in some perverted fashion it seems to me that if
>> I use a GPL library with something the whole thing should go GPL, i.e. my
This was my impression of GPL too. I thought that's why the LGPL (?) was
cr
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> True. The problem is that in some perverted fashion it seems to me that if
> I use a GPL library with something the whole thing should go GPL, i.e. my
Yes - that's why I love GPL :)
> use of ZPoPyDA could make me obliged to distribute Zope under GP
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > AFAIK this is the only DA with GPL license.
> > Both Zope and python have much freer licenses making GPL probably
> > a poor choice if you "aims to replace the current ZPygresql DA".
> >
> > What is the reason behind
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Andrew Kenneth Milton's letter:
> +[ Federico Di Gregorio ]-
> |
> | the only good reason for changing the license would be Digital Creations
> | asking us to do so because they want to include ZPoPyDA in one of t
+[ Federico Di Gregorio ]-
|
| the only good reason for changing the license would be Digital Creations
| asking us to do so because they want to include ZPoPyDA in one of their
| products but don't want to be binded by the gpl. we are using zope and
hi,
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This database adapter is released under the GPL Licence.
>
> AFAIK this is the only DA with GPL license.
> Both Zope and python have much freer licenses making GPL probably
> a poor choice if you "aims to replace the current ZPygresql DA".
>
>
Hi!
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> AFAIK this is the only DA with GPL license.
> Both Zope and python have much freer licenses making GPL probably
> a poor choice if you "aims to replace the current ZPygresql DA".
>
> What is the reason behind GPL'ing it ?
Aha, well, the GPL-vs
Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > try also,
> >
> > ZPoPyDA
> >
> > ZPoPyDA is a *stable* Postgresql Database Adapter for Zope based on our driver
>PoPy.
> > It aims to replace the current ZPygresql DA.
> >
> > This database adapter is released under the GPL Licence.
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> try also,
>
> ZPoPyDA
>
> ZPoPyDA is a *stable* Postgresql Database Adapter for Zope based on our driver PoPy.
> It aims to replace the current ZPygresql DA.
>
> This database adapter is released under the GPL Licence.
AFAIK this is the only DA with GPL license.
B
try also,
ZPoPyDA
ZPoPyDA is a *stable* Postgresql Database Adapter for Zope based on our driver PoPy.
It aims to replace the current ZPygresql DA.
This database adapter is released under the GPL Licence.
You can get the tarball at http://www.mixadlive.com/software
bye
Paolo Comitini
Mixa
Ok, pygresql is now DB-SIG compliant and thread safe.
http://druid.net/pygresql
What has to be done to create a one-database-connection-per-thread
PyGreSQL database adapter? Given the recent influx of resources into
PostgreSQL this would seem like a nice thing. Comments?
-- cary
12 matches
Mail list logo
