.
- Original Message -
From: "Bak @ kedai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Federico Di Gregorio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:10 AM
Subject: [Zope] Re: Fwd: [Zope] postgres DA
> I can only say that we started writing
> I can only say that we started writing PoPy and ZPoPyDA because pygresql
> (and the adapter based on it) are *not* thread safe. we were experimenting
> deadlocks in zope when you mix db access from sql methods and external
> methods in the same page.
quoting DAroadmap at
http://www.zope.org/Me
On Fri, 02 Jun 2000, Stephan Richter wrote:
hi stephan!
>
> I was just playing around with ZPoPyDA and PoPy (the Python module). It was
> a little tricky to install, since the setup scripts are not fully automatic
> yet, and the library header files did not point to my PostGres header files
>
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Paolo Comitini's letter:
> what's the current status of ZPygreSQLDA and ZPoPyDA? if i were to choose,
> which should i use? and the reasons for using it?
>
> i understand that ZPoPyDA is level 2 thread safety, and not quite sure what
> ZPygreSQLDA thread saf
hi all,
what's the current status of ZPygreSQLDA and ZPoPyDA? if i were to choose,
which should i use? and the reasons for using it?
i understand that ZPoPyDA is level 2 thread safety, and not quite sure what
ZPygreSQLDA thread safety is.
docs, pointers, explanation sought!
thanks
--
-
