On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 02:19:43PM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> > > Given Itamar's comments, I have changed his suggestion as follows:
> > >
> > > > You can try to fix this problem, by removing the "int(...)"
> > > > in "OFS.Image.py:186"
> > > >
> > >
> > > -mod_since=int(Date
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 03:10:59PM -0500, Jon Delheimer wrote:
> >
> > Shane,
> >
> > I made the changes you suggested to Image.py.
> >
> > Here are the results:
> >
> > Thursday, 11-May-00 16:21:32 GMT
> > 1900/05/11 16:21:31 GMT
> > -2197697908.0
>
> I have stepped
> > Given Itamar's comments, I have changed his suggestion as follows:
> >
> > > You can try to fix this problem, by removing the "int(...)"
> > > in "OFS.Image.py:186"
> > >
> >
> > -mod_since=int(DateTime(header).timeTime())
> >
> > +mod_since=long(DateTime(heade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Using the %{If-Modified-Since}i directive in the Apache log, we have been
> able to confirm that Netscape 3.01 and 4.06 on Win32 are sending
> If-Modified-Since with "16-May-00" type dates. Dieter's solution indeed
> fixes the problem by removing the Overflow error that
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 09:05:55PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>
> You can try to fix this problem, by removing the "int(...)"
> in "OFS.Image.py:186"
>
> mod_since=int(DateTime(header).timeTime())
>
> >
>
> mod_since=DateTime(header).timeTime()
Using the
You Rock Dieter,
Thanks to everyone for their input!
This has solved the nasty Netscape Image problem for now!
j
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:05 PM 5/23/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Jon Delheimer writes:
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> >
> > Shane,
> >
> > I made the changes you suggested to Image.py.
Jon Delheimer writes:
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Shane,
>
> I made the changes you suggested to Image.py.
>
> Here are the results:
>
> ...
> Thursday, 11-May-00 15:53:50 GMT
> 1900/05/11 15:53:50 GMT
> -2197699570.0
That explains the exception:
1900 is a bit too far in the
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 03:10:59PM -0500, Jon Delheimer wrote:
>
> Shane,
>
> I made the changes you suggested to Image.py.
>
> Here are the results:
>
> Thursday, 11-May-00 16:21:32 GMT
> 1900/05/11 16:21:31 GMT
> -2197697908.0
I have stepped through the debugger with the call of
ZPublisher.
:53:50 GMT
1900/05/11 15:53:50 GMT
-2197699570.0
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Shane Hathaway
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 1:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Ne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Well I have determined that it has nothing to do with PTK or Login Manager,
> well I think
> anyway...
>
> If you hit reload it breaks the images on the root level, if you put your
> cursor in the Location,
> or URL field and hit enter it reloads fine.
>
> I tru
Shane,
Nope the console is not visible, couldn't even log in.
j
At 02:23 PM 5/22/00 -0400, you wrote:
>John,
>
>Add the following lines just before line 186 of image.py and tell us
>what comes out on the console (not your browser, but the
>console--assuming the console is visible).
>
>
John,
Add the following lines just before line 186 of image.py and tell us
what comes out on the console (not your browser, but the
console--assuming the console is visible).
print header
print DateTime(header)
print DateTime(header).timeTime()
Shane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> O.K
>
Jon Delheimer wrote:
>
> Checking the Z2.log file shows that Zope is returning a 500 status code
> (Internal Server Error) when the broken images appear.
That's not good :(
That means something is causing the requests to go astray.
Can you see what the requested object is compared with the URL
O.K
If you just load the document in a Netscape Browseryou get the
imagethen
when you hit reload you get a Zope error message that says:
Zope Error
Zope has encountered an error while publishing this resource.
Error Type: OverflowError
Error Value: flo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Well I have determined that it has nothing to do with PTK or Login Manager,
> well I think
> anyway...
I would agree as I've experienced this exact same problem with Netscape
3.04 and my Squishdot site at http://www.bay-c.co.uk
cheers,
Chris
PS: I'd love to kn
olute URLs for images, so that's not an issue.
>
>Could LoginManager be denying access to the images on a refresh?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I just noticed something strange..it is only doing it when you are inside
> a Portal (ptk)...very strange..
Are the URLs to the images relative or absolute?
I am wondering if you are seeing a combination of aquisition and
relative image URLs. ISTR s
I just noticed something strange..it is only doing it when you are inside
a Portal (ptk)...very strange..
j
At 12:45 AM 5/22/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I'm experiencing the same thing with Navigator 4.08 on NT4 against Zope
>2.1.6 from Debian "potato". Disabling Navigator's cache f
I'm experiencing the same thing with Navigator 4.08 on NT4 against Zope
2.1.6 from Debian "potato". Disabling Navigator's cache fixes the problem.
That's not a satisfactory solution, though.
On Sun, 21 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have tried to track down a solution to this problem f
19 matches
Mail list logo
