On 10/2/18 1:05 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
I'm not a fan of using double == which is not obvious to catch the
typo. I think the `==` syntax may not be commonly known either (I
suspect it's seldom for a user to override java.security.policy rather
than augmenting it).
Have you considered using simple token `disallow` and `allow` (or
all-caps)?
I am fine with that as well.
The possibility of a custom security manager class named
`disallow` and `allow` should be low.
I agree. I could imagine there might be a custom SM class named
"Disallow" but that should still work, right?
--Sean
