On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:10:54 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > @AlanBateman So there is even more 3rd party code in there? :-( I tried to > > ignore fixes for all files that I could identify as 3rd party. It's > > actually a bit annoying that we have imported source code thrown around > > like this in the source tree, so there is no clear boundary between code we > > own and code we import from someone else... > > security-dev can say for sure but the only 3rd party code I see in this > change is in the src/java.xml.crypto/share/classes/com/sun/org/apache tree > (the package name gives a hint has it was it was re-packaged). The `src/java.xml.crypto/share/classes/org/jcp` tree is also 3rd party Apache code. However, I am ok with including the spelling fixes for the 3rd-party Apache code (this tree and the one Alan mentions above which you already reverted, but can put it back) with this PR. I am a Committer on the Apache Santuario project so I can push these spelling fixes (they should be non-controversial) to their code base and there won't be any conflicts when we merge up the JDK to the next Santuario release. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8340
