On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:57:03 GMT, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Let me take a closer look and get back to you. I feel like this is guarding >> against a bug in the code. A null CRL should never really be passed into >> `getMatchingCRLs`. > > I took another look and I see your point. The original condition wasn't > logically correct, that is a null CRL should never be wrapped into a > Collection. While we could probably restructure the code to not pass a null > CRL to `getMatchingCRLs`, it probably isn't worth it if it is not fixing an > existing issue. > > I'd wait for Jamil to run your latest changes thru our testing again. Thanks for taking another look. I'll wait for Jamil's testing results. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32164#discussion_r3771335081
