On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 06:20:36PM +0100, Bernd Schemmer wrote:
> >>The Registry model is NOT one to aspire to.
>
> I think that Solaris is going the wrong way with SMF. SMF as replacement
> for the init scripts is okay - but I don't think it's a good idea to
> replace existing config files with SMF properties.
> [...]
Boy, y'all misunderstood what this proposal was about:
_augment_, not replace.
*sigh*
I've tapped a raw vein of dislike of SMF, a blinding dislike.
All,
We're on the edge of a flamewar. Please, please pull back.
Anyways, I withdraw the proposal.
(Though I'm quite interested in the UFS/SMF/SQLite reliability thread.
I blame UFS though. ZFS boot, we need you.)
Nico
--
