Hey Mike, What about the turbulence issue, will mating the pop with the HS CAI
be beneficial?
Thanks in advance,
wes
www.wes.nissanpowe.com
Mike Kojima wrote:
> We are going to test the small diameter one vs the bigger present one and
> fool. around with the length a little.
>
> On the bigger engined SE-R, the smaller CAI did not help bottom end. So we
> are going to try both on the GA. If it works better, there will be a
> different part for the 1600cc motor.
>
> Mike
>
> > Will this CAI differ from the recently designed CAI. I have already
> >ordered this CAI and was wondering if the one your speaking of is the same.
> >Sounds like your getting a prototype! Give us a few more details if you
> >could. And also, Robert didn't seem to have the Specs. of the new CAI when
> >I talked to him last. What size piping are they using on the new CAI? Also
> >with the MAF being smaller than the piping (?), probably in both cases, is
> >this robbing us of potential power? Does turbulence in the intake charge
> >have an effect on power? After speaking with Clark at JWT he mentioned the
> >reason why the POP works well is because it actually reduces turbulence in
> >the intake charge! I already have the POP and am planning on Teaming it
> >with the new HS CAI! Any thoughts on this? Well that's enough for toda
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Go to <http://www.escribe.com/automotive/sml/> for the list archives.
