> The new SE-R will be like the old one, the best
> performing car for the price, not the best car in the
> world.
Exactly. I mean, my SE does not hold up to a Diablo (Motor Trend, "SE vs.
The Bull" pg 57, Jan 19XX), but it was deemed a better value. The WRX is a
$25,000 car that is an incredible value. The SE-R is a $18,000-$20,000 car
that has an incredible value as well. But, let's say I only make enough to
buy an SE-R. Who gives a rat's ass that the WRX is faster? I can't buy it,
so the SE-R is a better value in this case.
The following paragraph is bull. Just wanted to be a smart ass.
My buddies and I are currently comparing the Off Road Capabilites of a 96
200SX and a 88 Jeep Wrangler. This will hopefully prove once and for all
who is king of the dirt hill. Research has shown that even though the 200SX
is newer and cleaner, off roaders are still opt for the Wrangler. To prove
who is better in the dirt, we will run a series of tests.
1. 1/4 drag
2. Car show
3. Road Holding capabilites
4. Stereo soundoff
Our theory is that by comparing apples to oranges, and testing them in a way
that doesn't prove anything, we will be keeping in the theory that car
classes do not exist. A car is a car. It doesn't matter what it was
designed for. Price is fictional, buy what you want.
Scottie
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Have questions about your car? Try here: http://www.sentra.net
