Daniel, I got a friend help me with setting up the build process in eclipse. I had some problems there. So now I am able to look at your code regarding virtual domain resolvement.
Is it correct to say that in your modification everything related to 'domaintable' should be incorporated in james.java? Or am I per chance missing something? Regards, Pierre On 3/2/06, Pierre Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Daniel, > > Is it not possible to resolve the servernames in the VirtualUserTable with > a matcher and/or a mailet? > > Regards, > > Pierre > > > On 2/3/06, Daniel Perry (JIRA) <server-dev@james.apache.org> wrote: > > > > [ > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-426?page=comments#action_12365067] > > > > Daniel Perry commented on JAMES-426: > > ------------------------------------ > > > > I agree. The code i provided shouldn't affect any user of james, unless > > they add the extra attribute, so therefore could be added without causing > > any problems. I would suggest that it is put to a vote on the dev list, but > > as i am not a commiter, I dont really have a say. > > > > Daniel. > > > > > Make james use virtual user table domains for servernames > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: JAMES-426 > > > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-426 > > > Project: James > > > Type: Improvement > > > Components: James Core > > > Environment: N/A > > > Reporter: Daniel Perry > > > Priority: Trivial > > > Attachments: patch.txt > > > > > > Attached is a patch that makes james use the virtualusertable database > > for identifying local hosts. It also allows for continued use of > > servernames block. It is backwards compatible, and unless an extra > > attribute is added in the configuration, it wont affect james's behaviour. > > > It is configured by adding the domainTable attribute to the > > servernames element, eg: > > > <servernames autodetect="true" autodetectIP="true" > > domainTable="db://maildb/VirtualUserTable"> > > > Please note that the patch i will attach against svn trunk, but has > > been copied over directly from 2.2.0, and i havnt had a chance to check > > if it compiles or works with svn trunk. > > > Daniel. > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa > > - > > For more information on JIRA, see: > > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > >
