Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
the granularity of a module system is something that can be argued endlessly with no hope of consensus. IMO it would be a better use of energy to work out how we can effectively and efficiently modularize the JAMES backend.
I agree. I was just explaining Bernd my opinion because he clearly misunderstood it.
if there are developers with sufficient energy out there to push forward modularisation in a different way with more forward planning, that's fine by me. i don't have enough energy to adopt that right now but don't let that stop you.
I don't know what you would consider "forward", starting from the current trunk, so I will wait and I'll keep watching your efforts.
My opinion is still that you can keep working that way. I change my "old" +1 to a -0 just to let people know that things have gone differently from what I understood, but maybe I'll see the real advantages of that approach later.
Thank you, Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
