On Jan 16, 2008 9:10 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> Mine was a really concrete, alternative, proposal: merge the 2 modules if you spelled it out like that before, then my apologies (i must have missed it) combining the basic and avalon means that the only user implementation components available would have a hard dependency on avalon even though there are user implementations which do not rely on avalon. this is incorrect from a dependency management perspective. there are other ways to approach this problem. if if is simply the number of modules that concerns you then one approach would be to divide the backend code into modules based on their dependencies. <snip> > I just think I should be entitled to tell anytime I like what are my > preference and what is wrong IN MY OPINION. Once I do this others can > take the time to agree or disagree with me, and we can understand what > the community thinks about a given argument. i would find it easier to understand your arguments if they were phrased as concepts rather than opinions. if you put forward clearly your alternative ideas for JAMES then people could argue about these ideas and some of them may well be adopted. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
