On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> I checked MAVENUPLOAD and the first reference about junit is: > >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1168 > >> And it is about junit 4.1: the submitter say he took the pom from 4.0 > >> and updated it.. so this doesn't help for now. IF the original junit pom > >> was under the CPL then probably that user was not entitled in altering > >> the content and submit it to the ASF and the ASF should not have > >> uploaded it to central (is this right?). > > > > codehaus is not apache. any source use from codehaus needs to come in > > via the incubator IP clearance. > > > > - robert > > Hey... MAVENUPLOAD at codehaus is *THE* *WAY* artifacts use to be placed > in central by the ASF ;-) . Or at least this is what maven tells to the > world: > http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html > > I can also confirm that I have successfully created a pom for dnsjava, > uploaded it to codehaus MAVENUPLOAD JIRA and someone published it to the > maven central repository. > > I just repeat that MOST projects in ASF are using the poms included in > central and this is a big issue that is being mostly ignored, > unfortunately. That is why I think the PPMC are not being diligent and > the board should help spreading this issue and coordinate all the PPMCs > to find a common solution to this issue.
using artifacts from the maven repository does not worry me: distributing artifacts does - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
