Oleg Kalnichevski ha scritto:
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 20:45 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 12:40 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
About the repackaging (MIME4J-51) I think we almost have an agreement,
so I'd like to push this a little to understand if we can complete this
and avoid reverting this or releasing something in progress.
AFAICT the only pending issue is the "stream" package.
Niklas commented:
* Rename the stream package io. MimeTokenStream is a stream too. It's
a bit confusing to me that it isn't in the stream package.
I replied:
I'm fine with "io" but maybe a better option would be
streamfilters"/"inputstreams"/"inputfilters"/"filterinputstreams"/"filteris"
so to make it more descriptive. Opinions?
My current preference is "streamfilter" (more descriptive than "io" but
shorter than "filterinputstreams"), but I'm happy with any name.
+1 to renaming 'stream' as 'io'. We may end up having classes that are
related to IO but are not streams. IO sounds generic enough yet
descriptive.
+1
Folks
As far as I can tell no one objects the idea. If I hear no complaints,
I'll go ahead and rename the package and close MIME4J-51 tomorrow.
+1
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
