Ok, I have now every implementation in place except one for nntpserver. To be hornest I would be +1 for just remove the whole nntpserver stuff. IMHO, its just a left over from the "old days" and not maintained anyway. I don't think anyone is using it anyway. So what about just remove the whole nntpserver stuff . If we really find some usecase we can "merge" it back later.
Bye, Norman 2010/1/17 Mario Zsilak <[email protected]>: > Nice :) > >>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>Im Auftrag von Norman Maurer >>Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Januar 2010 12:30 >>An: James Developers List >>Betreff: Removing Cornerstone sockets in favor of MINA >> >>Hi all, >> >>as you maybe already noticed, I'm currently workin on writting async >>implementations of all networkserver using mina. This will give us the >>possibility to remove cornerstone sockets and "just" use MINA. I think >>thats the right way to go... >> >>WDYT ? >> >>The only server component which gives me headaches atm is the >>imapserver. But I need to dig a bit deeper in the code to understand >>how we can use it with MINA ... >> >> >>Bye, >>Norman >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
