2010/1/17 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: > Ok, I have now every implementation in place except one for > nntpserver. To be hornest I would be +1 for just remove the whole > nntpserver stuff. IMHO, its just a left over from the "old days" and > not maintained anyway. I don't think anyone is using it anyway. So > what about just remove the whole nntpserver stuff . If we really find > some usecase we can "merge" it back later.
+1 nntp has always been very basic and its storage was not compatible with pop3, so it is mainly some protocol code. It doesn't support most stuff one would expect from an nntp server, so it is ok to remove it and if anyone will ever need that he will help reintegrating the protocol back. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
