Just go ahead.. +1 Norman
2010/1/21 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2010/1/21 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: >>> I have cool stuff I'd like to do with NNTP and it gives James that >>> little bit extra that other servers don't have. However, for a while >>> I've been planning to pull out NNTP into a self contained product. Now >>> James 3 uses Spring I should be able to factor out an independent NNTP >>> product and then people interested in it can just drop and configure >>> using Spring. >>> >>> If people are in favour I should be able to do this pretty quick... >>> >>> Opinions? >> >> I don't want trunk development to be stopped by abandoned modules. >> That said if the module is not abandoned as we just found a new owner >> (you) then pulling it out to a self contained product could be the >> best solution. > > if there's support for the additional product, i can pull it out this > weekend. once it's out of trunk and trunk is no longer dependent on > NNTP then trunk development won't be effected whether it's abandoned > or not. if developers find time to work on it, it'll live. if not, > it's no longer a problem for trunk. > > anyone object to me pulling it out sometime soonish? > > - robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
