+1, if someone needs it, he has the option to install an old release of James.
Manolo On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Norman Maurer < [email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I have now every implementation in place except one for > nntpserver. To be hornest I would be +1 for just remove the whole > nntpserver stuff. IMHO, its just a left over from the "old days" and > not maintained anyway. I don't think anyone is using it anyway. So > what about just remove the whole nntpserver stuff . If we really find > some usecase we can "merge" it back later. > > > Bye, > Norman > > 2010/1/17 Mario Zsilak <[email protected]>: > > Nice :) > > > >>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > >>Im Auftrag von Norman Maurer > >>Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Januar 2010 12:30 > >>An: James Developers List > >>Betreff: Removing Cornerstone sockets in favor of MINA > >> > >>Hi all, > >> > >>as you maybe already noticed, I'm currently workin on writting async > >>implementations of all networkserver using mina. This will give us the > >>possibility to remove cornerstone sockets and "just" use MINA. I think > >>thats the right way to go... > >> > >>WDYT ? > >> > >>The only server component which gives me headaches atm is the > >>imapserver. But I need to dig a bit deeper in the code to understand > >>how we can use it with MINA ... > >> > >> > >>Bye, > >>Norman > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
