Re: RFR (S): 8193258: Better usage of JDWP HEADER SIZE

Fri, 08 Dec 2017 22:01:20 -0800

I think I ran everything svc related. I did the following

open/test/hotspot/jtreg/:hotspot_serviceability
open/test/jdk/:jdk_svc

Plus the closed equivalents and all our other closed svc test lists.

Chris

On 12/8/17 9:26 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Christoph,

You need to run at least the jdk/com/sun/jdi tests.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 12/8/17 13:07, Langer, Christoph wrote:

Hi Serguei,

 

I did only run hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jdwp, didn’t find a lot more in that area. I’m hoping/waiting for Chris’ tests then.

 

I agree, I will then remove inStream_endOfInput. If something like that is needed for future developments, it can easily be added again.

 

 

Best regards

Christoph

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Freitag, 8. Dezember 2017 21:12
To: Langer, Christoph <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Chris Plummer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RFR (S): 8193258: Better usage of JDWP HEADER SIZE

 

Hi Christoph,

The fix looks good to me.
What tests did you run?


On 12/8/17 07:07, Langer, Christoph wrote:

Hi,

 

Here’s a proposal to clean up the usage of the JDWP header size within the source code of libjdwp.

 

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193258

WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8193258.0/

 

As for inStream.c, I’m wondering wether inStream_endOfInput shall be removed? It seems to be unused…


I'm inclined to remove it.
Otherwise, it must be:
  417 return (stream->left <= 0);

Thanks,
Serguei
 

Best regards

Christoph

 

 



Reply via email to