Re: RFR (S): 8193258: Better usage of JDWP HEADER SIZE

[Chris Plummer]

That's an internal link. Christoph won't be able to see them. Chris On 12/11/17 9:50 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Christoph, The testing looks good. These are the results:   http://java.se.oracle.com:10065/mdash/jobs/sspitsyn-clanger-JDK-8193258-20171212-0054-7258 The job includes hs-tier's from 1-5. There are some failures there but nothing related to the JDI or JDWP tests. Thanks, Serguei On 12/11/17 11:10, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Christoph, The fix looks good to me. I'll submit a mach5 job to make sure nothing is broken. Thanks, Serguei On 12/11/17 07:43, Langer, Christoph wrote: Hi Serguei, Chris,   please look at this webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8193258.2/   I spotted a few other locations in libdt_shmem where JDWP HEADER SIZE should be used. Builds and tests running…   Best regards Christoph   From: Langer, Christoph Sent: Sonntag, 10. Dezember 2017 10:52 To: 'serguei.spit...@oracle.com' <serguei.spit...@oracle.com>; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net Cc: Chris Plummer <chris.plum...@oracle.com> Subject: RE: RFR (S): 8193258: Better usage of JDWP HEADER SIZE   Hi Serguei,   I wasn’t aware that the jdk/com/sun/jdi tests would test libjdwp, I just found hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jdwp when searching for jdwp in the tests. But thanks to your hints I know better now. In fact I ran the jdi tests when testing my change for 8193183.   I made a new webrev which includes the removal of inStream_endOfInput: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8193258.1/. Can you please approve this.   This time I ran the jdi tests without issues and also did builds on Windows, linux x86, AIX, Solaris and Mac. J   Best regards Christoph       From: serguei.spit...@oracle.com [mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com] Sent: Samstag, 9. Dezember 2017 06:27 To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net; Chris Plummer <chris.plum...@oracle.com> Subject: Re: RFR (S): 8193258: Better usage of JDWP HEADER SIZE   Hi Christoph, You need to run at least the jdk/com/sun/jdi tests. Thanks, Serguei On 12/8/17 13:07, Langer, Christoph wrote: Hi Serguei,   I did only run hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jdwp, didn’t find a lot more in that area. I’m hoping/waiting for Chris’ tests then.   I agree, I will then remove inStream_endOfInput. If something like that is needed for future developments, it can easily be added again.     Best regards Christoph   From: serguei.spit...@oracle.com [mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com] Sent: Freitag, 8. Dezember 2017 21:12 To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net; Chris Plummer <chris.plum...@oracle.com> Subject: Re: RFR (S): 8193258: Better usage of JDWP HEADER SIZE   Hi Christoph, The fix looks good to me. What tests did you run? On 12/8/17 07:07, Langer, Christoph wrote: Hi,   Here’s a proposal to clean up the usage of the JDWP header size within the source code of libjdwp.   Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193258 WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8193258.0/   As for inStream.c, I’m wondering wether inStream_endOfInput shall be removed? It seems to be unused… I'm inclined to remove it. Otherwise, it must be:   417 return (stream->left <= 0); Thanks, Serguei   Best regards Christoph