>
>First, "occasionally" is a vague term, and second, not everyone would
>agree with you on this.
Speak for yourself. I agree.
Personally, I see putting "OFF-TOPIC" on the
>the Subject: line as similar to putting on your flashers (sorry, don't
>know the British term for you UK'ers :-)
hazard lights
>Only one side of the situation has
>been presented (Adam Smith's, the accuser), and not in very much
>detail (not that I think more should be posted to the list).
Adam didn't ask for us to side with him. I did so because I felt like he
deserved support. He in fact simply asked for help where to complain. Any
official body taking up the complaint would ask for copies of the personal
emails as evidence, presumably, and judge for themselves.
>
>But really, I think this situation should not be played out on the
>list.
>
Abuse by list members is on-topic. Like membership of any club, there will
be debates about rude members, those who don't follow rules etc!
D Lampon
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
