"Lewis, Tony" wrote:
> > Well, not really. There are quite a few changes (based on relatively
> > limited info available).
>
> With all due respect, Anders, the changes you have described are not changes
> to the SET protocol.
Thank you Tony and Anders
If I may clarify my needs, I am keen to understand *all* aspects of 3D
SET, so the statement that there are minimal changes to the protocol
helps me, but does not fill in much of the broader picture which I'm
keen to understand. Where do you get your information from ? If there is
no spec for the latest developments, how do we converge ?
Are there any reference implementations published currently ?
Regards,
Thomas
