>From my experiences with setiathome that's a good time for a celeron 500
(version 2.04), with a pentium 3/2 (of equal clockspeed) being able to do a
work unit in around 6 hours (version 2.04) and now around 10 hours (version
3.xx). Under version 2.04 a Celeron 400 took around 22 hours, so 18 hours is
most certainly good. Then again that Celeron 400 was my brothers and he
probably didn't leave it online 24/7
Which version are you running?
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Hartzell
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 12:16 PM
Subject: benchmarks
I have a general question.
I'm running setiathome on a Intel celeron 500 with 128 meg of ram.
Everything is disabled except for explorer and systray. The best time I can
get is around 18 hours per work unit. This is with setiathome minimized to
the tray, and the "blank screen" screen saver set to 1 minute.
Is this a good time? According to setispy (add on program) the celeron
should be doing a lot better.
Thanks
Chris
==
Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
