That's exactly what I was thinking. As far as personalization goes Trac
seems pretty set in its ways.
Hey look, the offer is up: if you want a website I'm here to write it. If
you want me to customize an existing bug tracking platform I can do that for
you as well.
In other words, I think I will do us all a favour and keep my head out of
the kernel. I will be here to to do gfx/website and when the time is right,
I can start coding the frameworks.
On Dec 10, 2007 8:21 PM, Bruce Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't mind *using* a site in RoR. But I think it would be silly for any
> of us to go too much out of the way to *write* a site, at least not an
> entire one.
>
> We know that Trac works okay. I'm just personally bothered about how
> un-personable it is to the average passerby. (Mono has a much prettier
> welcome page...)
>
> And I repeat myself only for clarity, (not for persistence), there are
> commercial products that we can get free licenses for, like Jira (which I
> can vouch works well).
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> SharpOS-Developers mailing list
> SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
>
>
--
Jonathan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
