(Noise in subject line removed; case number added) On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 09:32 -1000, Joseph Kowalski wrote: > Summary about switching "more" to "less"... > > 1) less must not be a regression from more (currently identifies > as Asian lang. support, but maybe there is more). > > 2) I believe such a switch requires a Minor binding. > > Could other ARC members chime with opinions on the above two bullets?
strong agreement on #1. weak agreement on #2 -- I believe that there may be ways to implement the "more" command using the "less" codebase that would be sufficiently compatible that I'd accept a Patch binding.
