Joseph Kowalski wrote: > Summary about switching "more" to "less"... > > 1) less must not be a regression from more (currently identifies as > Asian lang. > support, but maybe there is more). > > 2) I believe such a switch requires a Minor binding. Even if we > could make > a patch out of it, its such an in-your-face change that it goes > against the > expectations of a patch (Update) release. > > Could other ARC members chime with opinions on the above two bullets?
I agree on both points. For 1) I think this case could just be dependent on shipping an upto date less that doesn't have those regressions if they are just bugs that can be fixed by an update to less. -- Darren J Moffat
