Actually Caja isn't used in production or production ready (yet) so
that's not a difference between the two versions.
The java version is already used in production by a number of very
large sites (igoogle sandbox, orkut, hi5, etc), so is road tested and
'proven technology', in that regard it's a very safe bet to use that.
The PHP version is currently already live on 3 production sites that
are a bit smaller but working great; And will be going live on a very
large site 'any day now', and dozens of others (ranging from medium to
large sized) later this summer, so it's not very far behind.
From the language perspective i refuse to comment, everyone has their
own preferences and almost every language can be fast, stable and
scale well, so let's not ever tread in that territory ok :)
Short of it, their both fine choices, pick the one that suits you
best :)
-- Chris
On Jun 20, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Leonardo wrote:
Hi all,
as far as I'm reading,
it seems the java version is "better" from a production-ready
perspective.
am I wrong?
is it only due to the Caja availabilty?
are there other considerations? (i.e. scalability?)
what about other implementations?
a full-compliant RoR flavour would be great.
Thanks to all
leonardo
