Am Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009 20:13:33 schrieb Tom: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Mike Westerhof (mwester) > > > Mike, please provide more information about the footprint differences. > If they are really like you claim they are, I vote +1 for openssh.
I did a quick test... dropbear with one login: r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /proc/1325/status Name: dropbear VmPeak: 2104 kB VmSize: 2100 kB VmLck: 0 kB VmHWM: 492 kB VmRSS: 492 kB VmData: 308 kB VmStk: 84 kB VmExe: 176 kB VmLib: 1352 kB VmPTE: 6 kB r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /proc/2470/status Name: dropbear VmPeak: 2280 kB VmSize: 2276 kB VmLck: 0 kB VmHWM: 868 kB VmRSS: 868 kB VmData: 316 kB VmStk: 84 kB VmExe: 176 kB VmLib: 1456 kB VmPTE: 6 kB openssh with one login: r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /proc/2804/status Name: sshd VmPeak: 3764 kB VmSize: 3760 kB VmLck: 0 kB VmHWM: 964 kB VmRSS: 964 kB VmData: 360 kB VmStk: 84 kB VmExe: 272 kB VmLib: 2620 kB VmPTE: 8 kB r...@om-gta02 ~ $ cat /proc/2813/status Name: sshd VmPeak: 3888 kB VmSize: 3884 kB VmLck: 0 kB VmHWM: 1908 kB VmRSS: 1904 kB VmData: 360 kB VmStk: 84 kB VmExe: 272 kB VmLib: 2676 kB VmPTE: 8 kB > > Tom. -- Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
