Warren Baird wrote: > I definitely don't want to belittle the work you and everyone else is > doing on the new shr
I don't feel belittled or offended. There are definitely areas of instability and unreliability, no doubt about that. Unfortunately, Nokia decided to buy QT, rather than spending the money on FSO development :) > Things have also improved tremendously > since the first 'new' shr image. Oh yes :) > I had fewer problems like that with the 'old' shr... Given that there were much less changes in the old shr, it is no wonder it was more "stable". Something that I hope to address with the shr-testing series. Fewer, but larger changes. > but as I said, I think it's great that so much progress is being made. > I'm still running the new shr-u build, and will try to upgrade to the > shr-t build as soon as I get a chance. Given how fast things seem to > be moving on the new SHR, I *hope* that these general unreliability > issues will disappear soon. I fully agree with that :) spaetz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
