On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:43PM +0300, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Cry <[email protected]> wrote: > > As far as I can tell the word "stable" in reference to the 1 Apr release > is > going to be "stable" as in "Resistant to change of position or condition; > not > easily moved or disturbed" rather than "Maintaining equilibrium; self > restoring". > > > I agree completely! I also don't think we should release a stable.
The name "stable" does kind of make me think of a finished product rather than just a frozen set of packages. If people require a more frozen distro perhaps a compromise would be to increase the time between changes to SHR-T? _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
