On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Sebastian Spaeth <[email protected]>wrote:
> I just cannot repeat it often enough though :-): > This is "stable" as in "unmoving". It is the same thing as shr-testing > from about November 2009. Coming to think about it, not only that I disagree with calling this stable, but I also very much against doing this "release" at all. We changed frameworkd's internal structure and made an upgrade that requires manual tweaking. Although this was bearable in unstable/testing, I don't think we can/should make the "stable" users go through the same thing. I assumed the "stable" image would at least be with the new frameworkd (opimd). > And while basic GSM works, there were a lot of > things that were not implemented back then. On the positive side, things > like GSM are working there, and there are not going to be updates that > break it :-) (which is an improvement in some cases). > Again, I think we should include the many bug fixes that were released since then. > > The other SHR devs are basically in disagreement with me in even calling > this "stable" because they want to push a more feature-complete > milestone out as stable only. Me, having been waiting for this milestone > to appear since Summer 2008, I think this is still a worthwhile branch > to push out for people. I know that I will be putting the upcoming shr-S > on a partition of my SD card as a fallback phone distro. > > I completely disagree with this approach and to be honest, I don't remember anyone doing a vote concerning releasing this stable release, I'm *VERY* againt it, and from what you said, I'm not the only one, so why are we doing this release anyway?! -- Tom.
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
