On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:09:05 +0000, Nick White <[email protected]> wrote: > However shr-t has occasionally proven unusable for me, and it's good > to have access to a reasonably frozen release which I know works.
Right > I don't see the images of shr-t from last year which are planned to > transition to stable on the website. Nope, they are gone. > Call it shr-stable-0.1 if you want, or shr-testing-2009, but an > older release, which I know has no bugs which stop me from using my > openmoko as a basic phone, is important to me. I fully agree, and that was basically my intent. I seem to have miscommunicated my intentions though and people seem to attach some magic attribute to the term "stable" that I did not see. If someone wants to become involved in SHR, putting such a thing out would be an easy and worthwhile goal. spaetz _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
