On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Sebastian Spaeth <[email protected]>wrote:
> Increasing the time between updates would be no guarantee that an > upgrade does not break your phone (as happened with my latest shr-T > update). Also, people start pushing me for updates when I have not > updated shr-T for one week, asking for bug fixes. > > Bug fixes should be pushed all the time (at least the major ones), and maybe we should tag versions that work in unstable so it'll be easier for you to handle, but that does not mean we should not update or whatever. Furthermore, the longer it takes between upgrades, more likely it is that you will have to do a "big" upgrade in testing that may include issues and will be harder to revert. The correct way (which we don't do at the moment) is maybe starting to revert package versions when they break. (We should have a prefixed shr version, like we have when we use git builds for example). -- Tom.
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
